New 42-day free trial Get it now
Smarty

Testing in Go by example: Part 4

Smarty header pin graphic
Updated October 29, 2025
Tags
Smarty header pin graphic

I think it's time for a slight detour. In part 1 we covered the basics of testing in go. In part 2 we covered a few slick ways to execute tests. In part 3 we covered some of our recent endeavors at Smarty to build on the basics. Toward the end of that post, we went into some detail regarding our approach to assertions. The assertions referenced in the GoConvey project are actually their own separate project that are imported into GoConvey. The nice thing about separating the assertions into their own separate project is that they can be used, well, separately. In this post, I'll show you some of the different ways we use the assertions project in our code outside of the GoConvey project.

In GoConvey, the So function exported by the convey package is void. All results of calling So() are swallowed by the convey functionality and passed to the reporting mechanisms. The assertions package (in the assertions project) exports its own version of the So() function, but it returns 2 parameters:

func So(actual interface{}, assert assertion, expected ...interface{}) (bool, string)

Here's the GoDoc comment:

So is a convenience function (as opposed to an inconvenience function?) for running assertions on arbitrary arguments in any context, be it for testing or even application logging. It allows you to perform assertion-like behavior (and get nicely formatted messages detailing discrepancies) but without the program blowing up or panicking. All that is required is to import this package and call So with one of the assertions exported by this package as the second parameter. The first return parameter is a boolean indicating if the assertion was true. The second return parameter is the well-formatted message showing why an assertion was incorrect, or blank if the assertion was correct.

You probably noticed the unexported type assertion in the So() signature above. Here's what it looks like:

// assertion is an alias for a function with a signature that the So()
// function can handle. Any future or custom assertions should conform to this
// method signature. The return value should be an empty string if the assertion
// passes and a well-formed failure message if not.
type assertion func(actual interface{}, expected ...interface{}) string

Each of the Should assertion functions in the assertions package can be used as an assertion func when calling So().

Here's a simple example of how to use So() with an assertion function in your code:

x, y := 99, 100
if ok, message := So(x, ShouldBeGreaterThan, y); !ok {
    log.Println(message)
    // or log.Fatal(message) if you're feeling unforgiving...
}

Notice that this example makes no reference to the "testing" package's *testing.T, but it could:

x, y := 99, 100
if ok, message := So(x, ShouldBeGreaterThan, y); !ok {
    t.Error(message)
}

If you know you're going to be using So within your test functions and calling t.Error() and the like, here's another way to use the assertions package:

func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
	x, y := 99, 100
	assertions.New(t).So(x, ShouldBeGreaterThan, y)
}

Did you notice how we passed in t in the assertions.New() function? The nice thing about this approach is you don't actually have to call t.Error() in failure scenarios. That is handled by the Assertion.So() function because it is given a reference to t.

You can actually call .So() multiple times on an Assertion instance:

assert := assertions.New(t)
assert.So(1, ShouldBeGreaterThan, 2)
assert.So(true, ShouldBeFalse)
assert.So(time.Now(), ShouldHappenBefore, time.Now())
// etc...

You can find out if any of those assertions failed and act accordingly:

if assert.Failed() {
	log.Fatal("Ouch")
}

You've probably noticed that to be able to reference assertions.New and ShouldEqual you'll need an import statement like this:

import (
	"github.com/smartystreets/assertions"
	. "github.com/smartystreets/assertions"
)

func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
	assert := assertions.New(t)
	assert.So(1, ShouldBeGreaterThan, 2)
	assert.So(true, ShouldBeFalse)
	assert.So(time.Now(), ShouldHappenBefore, time.Now())
}

That's somewhat awkward, so we created an alias package for the assertion functions called should:

import (
	"github.com/smartystreets/assertions"
	"github.com/smartystreets/assertions/should"
)

func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
	assert := assertions.New(t)
	assert.So(1, should.BeGreaterThan, 2)
	assert.So(true, should.BeFalse)
	assert.So(time.Now(), should.HappenBefore, time.Now())
}

Did you catch the difference? ShouldBeGreaterThan becomes should.BeGreaterThan. If you're using goimports, then this approach works out really smoothly. If you're not using goimports, why not? It's easy to set up.

The moral of the story is that it should be easy to check that a value is what you expect it to be. We prefer not to write if statements and hand-crafted log statements whenever possible, so we've created the assertions package that helps us in various contexts, both in testing and otherwise. In the next post, we'll talk about yet another use of the assertions package as we talk about our newest test library called gunit.

Before signing off, I would be remiss if I didn't give credit to Aaron Jacobs, the creator of the oglematchers package, which many of the assertion functions use internally to do their jobs.

Subscribe to our blog!
Learn more about RSS feeds here.
Read our recent posts
Smarty customers avoid USPS rate limiting
Arrow Icon
TLDR: Smarty customers won’t feel a thing from the new USPS API restrictions because Smarty doesn’t depend on USPS’s real-time APIs to do address verification. We’ve always used our own, powerful, hyper-accurate data to back our tools and support client needs. While USPS is capping its address verification service at 60 requests per hour and retiring the legacy Web Tools API on January 25, Smarty keeps verifying addresses at full speed on our own infrastructure. We ingest USPS data updates monthly and run verification internally, so USPS API changes, rate limits, or even a temporary USPS outage don’t ripple into your workflows.
Provider data accuracy: Regulatory compliance and hidden network risks
Arrow Icon
Welcome to part one of our new blog series on provider location data—an exploration into the messy, high-stakes world of healthcare compliance, address accuracy, and network adequacy. To kick things off, we sat down with Dave Medlock, founder of Maven One Health and a contributing thought leader, to discuss why clean provider data is essential for achieving peak regulatory compliance and meeting requirements with ease, thereby avoiding serious consequences if it isn’t done correctly. Here’s what he had to say about understanding CMS, state DOIs, continuous audits, rosters, data decay, messy inputs, and the future of address data itself.
Always on; always Smarty: High availability design and engineering best practices
Arrow Icon
When the digital world falters, our goal is simple: stay steady for our customers. At Smarty, reliability isn’t a bragging point, but rather a promise. We’ve built a platform designed to keep running even when others stop, using a vendor-agnostic, redundant infrastructure grounded in engineering best practices that weather disruptions with quiet consistency. Our customers depend on uninterrupted address data services. And, we take that trust seriously. And because we trust you, we’re offering a 42-day free trial on every product.

Ready to get started?